Executive overview The strategic positioning of covert access within the world’s telecommunication networks A months-long investigation by Rapid7 Labs has uncovered evidence of an advanced China-nexus threat actor, Red Menshen, placing some of the stealthiest digital sleeper cells the team has ever seen in telecommunications networks. The goal of these campaigns is to carry out high-level espionage, including against government networks. Telecommunications networks are the central nervous system of the digital world. They carry government communications, coordinate critical industries, and underpin the digital identities of billions of people. When these networks are compromised, the consequences extend far beyond a single provider or region. That level of access is, and should be, a national concern as it compromises not just one company or organization, but the communications of entire populations. Over the past decade, telecom intrusions have been reported across multiple countries. In several cases, state-backed actors accessed call detail records, monitored sensitive communications, and exploited trusted interconnections between operators. While these incidents often appear isolated, a broader pattern is emerging. Why telecom networks are strategic espionage targets Telecommunications infrastructure provides a uniquely valuable strategic positioning. Modern telecom networks are layered ecosystems composed of routing systems, subscriber management platforms, authentication services, billing systems, roaming databases, and lawful intercept capabilities. These systems rely on specialized signaling protocols such as SS7, Diameter, and SCTP to coordinate identity, mobility, and connectivity across national and international boundaries. Persistent access within these environments enables far more than a conventional data breach. An adversary positioned inside the telecom core may gain visibility into subscriber identifiers, signaling flows, authentication exchanges, mobility events, and communications metadata. In the most concerning scenarios, this level of access could support long-term intelligence collection, large-scale subscriber tracking, and monitoring of sensitive communications involving high-value geopolitical targets. Telecommunications networks sit at the intersection of identity, mobility, and global connectivity. Compromise at this layer carries national and international implications. A structured campaign, not isolated incidents What looks like discrete breaches increasingly resembles a repeatable campaign model designed to establish persistent access inside telecommunications infrastructure. Our investigation uncovered a long-term and ongoing operation attributed to a China-nexus threat actor. Rather than conducting short-term intrusion activity, the operators appear focused on long-term positioning by embedding stealthy access mechanisms deep inside telecom and critical environments and maintaining them for extended periods. In
Security & IT News
LiveReal-time news from 13+ trusted sources — BleepingComputer, The Hacker News, Krebs on Security, Dark Reading & more.
753 results in Vulnerability
p a href= https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-085-01.json strong View CSAF /strong /a /p h2 Summary /h2 p strong An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a hidden function in the CLI prompt to escape the restricted interface, leading to full compromise of the device. /strong /p p The following versions of WAGO GmbH amp; Co. KG Industrial Managed Switches are affected: /p ul li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1812 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.3.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1816 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.8.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-303 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1305 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1305/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1505/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.1.9.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1505 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.0.6.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-602 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.0.6.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-603 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.5.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1605 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1812/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware versions prior to V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1816/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.0.6.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-602 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.0.6.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-603 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.1.9.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1505 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1305 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1305/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.0.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1505/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1812 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1816 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1812/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.1.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1816/010-000 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.3.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1813/000-001 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.5.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-1605 (CVE-2026-3587) /li li WAGO Firmware version V1.2.8.S0 WAGO_Hardware_852-303 (CVE-2026-3587)
p a href= https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-085-03.json strong View CSAF /strong /a /p h2 Summary /h2 p strong Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution. /strong /p p The following versions of PTC Windchill Product Lifecycle Management are affected: /p ul li Windchill PDMLink 11.0_M030 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 11.1_M020 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 11.2.1.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 12.0.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 12.1.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 13.0.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 13.1.0.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 13.1.1.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 13.1.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li Windchill PDMLink 13.1.3.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 11.0_M030 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 11.1_M020 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 11.2.1.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 12.0.0.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 12.0.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 12.0.3.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 12.1.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 12.1.3.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 13.0.2.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li li FlexPLM 13.0.3.0 (CVE-2026-4681) /li /ul div class= csaf-table table class= tablesaw tablesaw-stack data-tablesaw-mode= stack data-tablesaw-minimap thead tr th role= columnheader data-tablesaw-priority= persist CVSS /th th role= columnheader Vendor /th th role= columnheader Equipment /th th role= columnheader Vulnerabilities /th /tr /thead tbody tr td v3 10 /td td PTC /td td PTC Windchill Product Lifecycle Management /td td Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') /td /tr /tbody /table /div h3 Background /h3 ul li strong Critical Infrastructure Sectors: /strong Critical Manufacturing /li li strong Countries/Areas Deployed: /strong Worldwide /li li strong Company Headquarters Location: /strong United States /li /ul hr h2 Vulnerabilities /h2 div class= csaf-accordion p a class= csaf-accordion-toggle-all href= # Expand All + /a /p div class= csaf-accordion-item h3 a class= csaf-accordion-toggle href= # CVE-2026-4681 /a /h3 div class= csaf-accordion-content p A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data. This issue affects Windchill PDMLink: 11.0 M030, 11.1 M020, 11.2.1.0, 12.0.2.0, 12.1.2.0, 13.0.2.0, 13.1.0.0, 13.1.1.0, 13.1.2.0, 13.1.3.0; FlexPLM: 11.0 M030, 11.1 M020, 11.2.1.0, 12.0.0.0, 12.0.2.0, 12.0.3.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, 13.0.2.0, 13.0.3.0. /p p a href= https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4681 View CVE Details /a /p hr h4 Affected Products /h4 h5 PTC Windchill Product Lifecycle Management /h5 div class= ics-vendor-version-status div class= ics-vendor strong Vendor: /strong br PTC /div div class= ics-version strong Product Version: /strong br PTC Windchill PDMLink: 1
p a href= https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-085-02.json strong View CSAF /strong /a /p h2 Summary /h2 p strong Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an authenticated low-privileged user to gain access to SMS messages outside of their authorized tenant scope via a crafted company or tenant identifier parameter. /strong /p p The following versions of OpenCode Systems OC Messaging and USSD Gateway are affected: /p ul li OC Messaging 6.32.2 (CVE-2025-70614) /li li USSD Gateway 6.32.2 (CVE-2025-70614) /li /ul div class= csaf-table table class= tablesaw tablesaw-stack data-tablesaw-mode= stack data-tablesaw-minimap thead tr th role= columnheader data-tablesaw-priority= persist CVSS /th th role= columnheader Vendor /th th role= columnheader Equipment /th th role= columnheader Vulnerabilities /th /tr /thead tbody tr td v3 8.1 /td td OpenCode Systems /td td OpenCode Systems OC Messaging and USSD Gateway /td td Improper Access Control /td /tr /tbody /table /div h3 Background /h3 ul li strong Critical Infrastructure Sectors: /strong Communications /li li strong Countries/Areas Deployed: /strong Worldwide /li li strong Company Headquarters Location: /strong Bulgaria /li /ul hr h2 Vulnerabilities /h2 div class= csaf-accordion p a class= csaf-accordion-toggle-all href= # Expand All + /a /p div class= csaf-accordion-item h3 a class= csaf-accordion-toggle href= # CVE-2025-70614 /a /h3 div class= csaf-accordion-content p OpenCode Systems Custom Messaging Gateway 6.32.2 contains a web access vulnerability allowing one authenticated user to gain access to another authenticated user's messages via a crafted identifier parameter. /p p a href= https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-70614 View CVE Details /a /p hr h4 Affected Products /h4 h5 OpenCode Systems OC Messaging and USSD Gateway /h5 div class= ics-vendor-version-status div class= ics-vendor strong Vendor: /strong br OpenCode Systems /div div class= ics-version strong Product Version: /strong br OpenCode Systems OC Messaging: 6.32.2, OpenCode Systems USSD Gateway: 6.32.2 /div div class= ics-status strong Product Status: /strong br known_affected /div /div div class= ics-remediations h6 Remediations /h6 p strong Mitigation /strong br The vulnerability was identified by OpenCode Systems on January 5, 2026 and remediated on January 6, 2026 with the release of version 6.33.11. /p p strong Mitigation /strong br For more information, contact OpenCode: https://opencode.com/about/contact-us br a href= https://opencode.com/about/contact-us https://opencode.com/about/contact-us /a /p /div p strong Relevant CWE: /strong a href= https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/284.html CWE-284 Improper Access Control /a /p hr h4 Metrics /h4 div class= csaf-table csaf-metrics-table table class= tablesaw tablesaw-stack data-tablesaw-mode= stack data-tablesaw-minimap thead tr th role= columnheader data-tablesaw-priority= persist CVSS Version /th th role= columnhead
p CISA has added one new vulnerability to its a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog" data-entity-type="node" data-entity-uuid="79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291" data-entity-substitution="canonical" title="Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog" Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog /a , based on evidence of active exploitation. /p ul li a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33634" target="_blank" CVE-2026-33634 /a Aqua Security Trivy Embedded Malicious Code Vulnerability /li /ul p This type of vulnerability is a frequent attack vector for malicious cyber actors and poses significant risks to the federal enterprise. /p p a href="https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01" Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities /a established the KEV Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Reducing_the_Significant_Risk_of_Known_Exploited_Vulnerabilities_211103.pdf" BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet /a for more information. /p p Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog" data-entity-type="node" data-entity-uuid="79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291" data-entity-substitution="canonical" title="Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog" KEV Catalog vulnerabilities /a as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities" data-entity-type="node" data-entity-uuid="f2adba9a-0404-494c-a90c-4363a4a5c934" data-entity-substitution="canonical" title="Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities" specified criteria /a . nbsp; /p
Some weeks in security feel loud. This one feels sneaky. Less big dramatic fireworks, more of that slow creeping sense that too many people are getting way too comfortable abusing things they probably shouldn t even be touching. There s a little bit of everything in this one, too. Weird delivery tricks, old problems coming back in slightly worse forms, shady infrastructure doing
Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a new payment skimmer that uses WebRTC data channels as a means to receive payloads and exfiltrate data, effectively bypassing security controls. "Instead of the usual HTTP requests or image beacons, this malware uses WebRTC data channels to load its payload and exfiltrate stolen payment data," Sansec said in a report published this week. The attack,
(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
GitHub is adopting AI-based scanning for its Code Security tool to expand vulnerability detections beyond the CodeQL static analysis and cover more languages and frameworks. [...]
Attacks leveraging the 'PolyShell' vulnerability in version 2 of Magento Open Source and Adobe Commerce installations are underway, targeting more than half of all vulnerable stores. [...]
Threat actors are evading phishing detection in campaigns targeting Microsoft accounts by abusing the no-code app-building platform Bubble to generate and host malicious web apps. [...]
Introduction This diary provides indicators from the SmartApeSG (ZPHP, HANEYMANEY) campaign I saw on Tuesday, 2026-03-24. SmartApeSG is one of many campaigns that use the ClickFix technique. This past week, I've seen NetSupport RAT as follow-up malware from Remcos RAT pushed by this campaign. But this time, I also saw indicators for StealC malware and Sectop RAT (ArecheClient2) after NetSupport RAT appeared on my infected lab host. Not all of the follow-up malware appears shortly after the initial Remcos RAT malware. Here's the timeline for malware from my SmartApeSG activity on Tuesday 2026-03-24: 17:11 UTC - Ran ClickFix script from SmartApeSG fake CAPTCHA page 17:12 UTC - Remcos RAT post-infection traffic starts 17:16 UTC - NetSupport RAT post-infection traffic starts 18:18 UTC - StealC post-infection traffic starts 19:36 UTC - Sectop RAT post-infection traffic starts While the NetSupport RAT activity happened approximately 4 minutes after the Remcos RAT activity, the StealC traffic didn't happen until approximately 1 hour after the NetSupport RAT activity started. And the traffic for Sectop RAT happened approximately 1 hour and 18 minutes after the StealC activity started. Images from the infection Shown above: Page from a legitimate but compromised website with injected script for the fake CAPTCHA page. Shown above: Fake CAPTCHA page with ClickFix instructions. This image shows the malicious script injected into a user's clipboard. Shown above: Traffic from the infection filtered in Wireshark. Indicators of Compromise Associated domains and IP addresses: fresicrto[.]top - Domain for server hosting fake CAPTCHA page urotypos[.]com - Called by ClickFix instructions, this domain is for a server hosting the initial malware 95.142.45[.]231:443 - Remcos RAT C2 server 185.163.47[.]220:443 - NetSupport RAT C2 server 89.46.38[.]100:80 - StealC C2 server 195.85.115[.]11:9000 - Sectop RAT (ArechClient2) C2 server Example of HTA file retrieved by ClickFix script: SHA256 hash: 212d8007a7ce374d38949cf54d80133bd69338131670282008940f1995d7a720 File size: 47,714 bytes File type: HTML document text, ASCII text, with very long lines (6272) Retrieved from: hxxps[:]//urotypos[.]com/cd/temp Saved location: C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\post.hta Note: ClickFix script deletes the file after retrieving and running it Example of ZIP archive for Remcos RAT retrieved by the above HTA file: SHA256 hash: a6a748c0606fb9600fdf04763523b7da20b382b054b875fdd1ef1c36fc16079a File size: 85,328,653 bytes File type: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract, compression method=deflate Retrieved from: hxxps[:]//urotypos[.]com/ls/production Saved location: C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\361118191\361118191.pdf ZIP archive containing NetSupport RAT package: SHA256 hash: 6e26ff49387088178319e116700b123d27216d98ba3ae1ce492544cb9acd38f0 File size: 9,171,647 bytes File type: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract, compression method=deflate File name: UpdateIn
AI accounts are becoming part of the cybercrime supply chain, sold like email accounts or VPS access. Flare Systems shows how underground markets bundle and resell premium AI access at scale. [...]
If it’s online, it’s a target Web applications are no longer just business enablers, they’re often the front door to an organization. They can often generate revenue, enforce identity, connect systems and hold customer and business data. “ 75% of successful Vector Command breaches were conducted through web apps. ” – Principal Security Consultant, Vector Command Team at Rapid7 From SaaS platforms and identity providers to customer portals and internal tools, attackers increasingly rely on web applications as their initial access point. In fact, application-driven attacks account for a significant percentage of real-world breaches. But testing web applications for real risk isn’t the same as scanning for bugs; that’s where Vector Command (Rapid7’s continuous managed red team service) comes in. Figure 1: Vector Command Advanced How Vector Command approaches web applications Vector Command evaluates web applications the same way real attackers do, by asking a single question: Can this application be used to meaningfully compromise the organization? Rather than attempting to enumerate every possible vulnerability, Vector Command focuses on exploitation paths that lead to real outcomes, such as: Account takeover Session hijacking Abuse of SaaS trust relationships Access to internal systems through vulnerabilities, such as malicious file uploads, injection issues, or misconfigurations in common web frameworks Lateral movement across applications Exfiltration of source code, if found during a breach Testing begins without authentication against externally facing applications, the external attack surface, or to put it another way, what a potential threat actor can see. If legitimate paths exist – self-registration, broken authentication and authorization controls, misconfigurations exposing unintended application functionality, or overall poor site hygiene leaking information that needs further research – those paths are pursued as part of a broader attack chain. The result isn’t a long list of low-risk findings, but rather a clear picture of what actually works. Figure 2: Sample Vector Command findings, by status What Vector Command does not do Vector Command is intentionally not a replacement for a full web application penetration test, although Rapid7 does offer this service. It does not: Guarantee full application coverage. Perform DAST or SAST scanning. Enumerate non-exploitable low-severity or theoretical vulnerabilities. Review source code unless it’s obtained during an attack. If your goal is to understand every potential flaw in an application, a dedicated web app penetration test is the right approach. However if your goal is to understand whether your sprawling stack of externally facing applications can be used to break into your organization, Vector Command is designed for that purpose. A real-world example: when the ticketing system becomes the attack path In one recent Vector Command engagement, attackers didn’t exploit a zero-day or compl
p CISA has added one new vulnerability to its a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= 79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog /a , based on evidence of active exploitation. /p ul li a href= https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33017 target= _blank CVE-2026-33017 /a Langflow Code Injection Vulnerability /li /ul p This type of vulnerability is a frequent attack vector for malicious cyber actors and poses significant risks to the federal enterprise. /p p a href= https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01 Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities /a established the KEV Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the a href= https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Reducing_the_Significant_Risk_of_Known_Exploited_Vulnerabilities_211103.pdf BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet /a for more information. /p p Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= 79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog KEV Catalog vulnerabilities /a as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= f2adba9a-0404-494c-a90c-4363a4a5c934 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities specified criteria /a . nbsp; /p
In September 2025, Anthropic disclosed that a state-sponsored threat actor used an AI coding agent to execute an autonomous cyber espionage campaign against 30 global targets. The AI handled 80-90% of tactical operations on its own, performing reconnaissance, writing exploit code, and attempting lateral movement at machine speed. This incident is worrying, but there's a scenario that should
Cybersecurity researchers are calling attention to an active device code phishing campaign that's targeting Microsoft 365 identities across more than 340 organizations in the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany. The activity, per Huntress, was first spotted on February 19, 2026, with subsequent cases appearing at an accelerated pace since then. Notably, the campaign leverages
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) said on Monday that it was banning the import of new, foreign-made consumer routers, citing "unacceptable" risks to cyber and national security. The action was designed to safeguard Americans and the underlying communications networks the country relies on, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said in a post on X. The development means that new models of
(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
Rapid7 has released a whitepaper titled “ The Weaponization of Cellular Based IoT Technology ,” by Deral Heiland, principal security researcher, IoT, at Rapid7, and Carlota Bindner, lead product security researcher at Thermo Fisher Scientific. The paper examines how attackers with physical access can exploit cellular modules in Internet of Things (IoT) devices to move into cloud and backend environments, exfiltrate data, and conceal command channels within expected device traffic. Heiland presented their findings at the RSAC 2026 conference in San Francisco. The research focuses on how these attacks work in practice. It details how interchip communications such as USB and universal asynchronous receiver-transmitter (UART) can be observed and manipulated. It also shows how hardware modifications can replace a device host, allowing an external system to assume control of the cellular module. The authors developed proof-of-concept tools, including a TCP port scanner using AT commands, an S3 bucket enumerator, a SOCKS5 proxy that routes traffic through the cellular module, and a Metasploit proxy module. These examples demonstrate how attackers can take advantage of trusted relationships between devices and connected services. The findings highlight consistent risks across tested devices. Cellular modules often expose multiple interfaces, and unused UART or USB paths can provide direct access. With targeted printed circuit board modifications, an attacker can reroute traffic through the cellular interface. Many modules accept AT commands that support raw sockets, HTTP requests, and TCP tunnels, which can enable reconnaissance and lateral movement. All cellular devices the researchers examined lacked tamper protections and most did not encrypt sensitive data before transmission, increasing exposure in environments that use private access point names (APNs). Organizations should treat cellular-enabled devices as privileged entry points into their networks as well as their critical data storage and management environments. This includes disabling or removing unused interchip interfaces, enforcing end-to-end encryption before data is transmitted through the cellular modules, and applying monitoring and outbound controls within APN architectures. Hardware-level security testing should be part of standard product security practices.To read the whitepaper, click here .