Researchers at ReliaQuest warn of persistent malware campaign targeting enterprise credentials
Security & IT News
LiveReal-time news from 13+ trusted sources — BleepingComputer, The Hacker News, Krebs on Security, Dark Reading & more.
p CISA has added one new vulnerability to its a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= 79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog /a , based on evidence of active exploitation. /p ul li a href= https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3055 target= _blank CVE-2026-3055 /a Citrix NetScaler Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability /li /ul p This type of vulnerability is a frequent attack vector for malicious cyber actors and poses significant risks to the federal enterprise. /p p a href= https://www.cisa.gov/binding-operational-directive-22-01 Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities /a established the KEV Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the a href= https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Reducing_the_Significant_Risk_of_Known_Exploited_Vulnerabilities_211103.pdf BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet /a for more information. /p p Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= 79453b83-86b9-4e2f-b1ec-abf73c6eb291 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog KEV Catalog vulnerabilities /a as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the a href= /known-exploited-vulnerabilities data-entity-type= node data-entity-uuid= f2adba9a-0404-494c-a90c-4363a4a5c934 data-entity-substitution= canonical title= Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities specified criteria /a . nbsp; /p
Secrets sprawl isn't slowing down: in 2025, it accelerated faster than most security teams anticipated. GitGuardian's State of Secrets Sprawl 2026 report analyzed billions of commits across public GitHub and uncovered 29 million new hardcoded secrets in 2025 alone, a 34% increase year over year and the largest single-year jump ever recorded. This year's findings reveal three core trends: AI has
A thoughtful review of Apple’s system to alert users that the camera is on. It’s really well-designed, and important in a world where malware could surreptitiously start recording. The reason it’s tempting to think that a dedicated camera indicator light is more secure than an on-display indicator is the fact that hardware is generally more secure than software, because it’s harder to tamper with. With hardware, a dedicated hardware indicator light can be connected to the camera hardware such that if the camera is accessed, the light must turn on, with no way for software running on the device, no matter its privileges, to change that. With an indicator light that is rendered on the display, it’s not foolish to worry that malicious software, with sufficient privileges, could draw over the pixels on the display where the camera indicator is rendered, disguising that the camera is in use. If this were implemented simplistically, that concern would be completely valid. But Apple’s implementation of this is far from simplistic.
F5 has reclassified a BIG-IP APM denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability as a critical-severity remote code execution (RCE) flaw, warning that attackers are exploiting it to deploy webshells on unpatched devices. [...]
Telnyx issues an urgent alert after hackers TeamPCP uploaded malicious versions (4.87.1 & 4.87.2) of its Python SDK to steal cloud and crypto credentials.
Researchers from watchTowr and Defused have found evidence that attackers are actively exploiting CVE-2026-3055, a critical NetScaler vulnerability
Microsoft has pulled a buggy Windows 11 non-security preview update to investigate a known issue that triggers 0x80073712 errors during installation. [...]
The UK Information Commissioner’s Office has handed a £100,000 fine to Birmingham-based TMAC
The European Commission has revealed details of a data breach impacting its AWS infrastructure
Attackers are now actively exploiting a critical vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiClient EMS platform, according to threat intelligence company Defused. [...]
Three threat activity clusters aligned with China have targeted a government organization in Southeast Asia as part of what has been described as a "complex and well-resourced operation." The campaigns have led to the deployment of various malware families, including HIUPAN (aka USBFect, MISTCLOAK, or U2DiskWatch), PUBLOAD, EggStremeFuel (aka RawCookie), EggStremeLoader (aka Gorem RAT), MASOL
The European Commission has confirmed a data breach after its Europa.eu web platform was hacked in a cyberattack claimed by the ShinyHunters extortion gang. [...]
(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
A lot of the information seen on DShield honeypots [1] is repeated bot traffic, especially when looking at the Cowrie [2] telnet and SSH sessions. However, how long a session lasts, how many commands are run per session and what the last commands run before a session disconnects can vary. Some of this information could help indicate whether a session is automated and if a honeypot was fingerprinted. This information can also be used to find more interesting honeypot sessions. To get an idea of what that variety looks like, I reviewed about 3 years of data from 6 honeypots. Some of the honeypots have been running for different periods of time, but it should give a good overview of different attacks seen on telnet/SSH honeypots. Since I already made a python script [3] that summarizes some of this data for me, it made the process a bit easier. Before going into the details, some of the basic information: Data Timeframe: 4/13/2022 - 3/21/2026 Number of Sessions: 1,206,566 Min Max Median Mean Range (Max-Min) Number of Commands Per Session 0 27742 17.49 20.0 27742 Duration of Sessions (Seconds) 0.041 1563.38 17.42 22.80 1563.38 Figure 1: Basic statistics for Cowrie session durations and number of commands run per session. In most sessions, we see about 20 commands and a session lasts for about 20 seconds. Number of Commands Per Session When a Cowrie session is allowed through, the client connection has the option of running commands. They client may decide to disconnect, run an automated script or run commands manually. Most of the time, there are usually under 30 commands run per session, but there are some sessions that have had over 25,000 commands run in a single session. Figure 2: There are many telnet/SSH sessions interacting with DShield honeypots that run over 25,000 commands in a single session, but most are much lower. Figure 3: Looking at most frequenty occuring number of commands run per telnet/SSH session, the majority are under 50 commads with the most frequent being 22 commands in a session. Commands in session Sessions found Percentage Running total 22 461,561 38.26% 38.26% 20 348,708 28.91% 67.17% 1 104,217 8.64% 75.81% 3 58,850 4.88% 80.69% 9 39,111 3.24% 83.93% 13 28,274 2.34% 86.27% 46 27,595 2.29% 88.56% 5 25,302 2.10% 90.66% 18 20,174 1.67% 92.33% 10 19,188 1.59% 93.92% Figure 4: The top 10 most commonly seen number of commands run in a session accounts for about 94% of the telnet/SSH sessions. Are the sessions with 22 commands similar? To help commands for differnet sessions the commands per session were concatenated and then hashed to arrive at a value that could be compared across sessions. This value would be the same if the same commands were run in the same order. This seemed like a great idea until I found a very small number of similar hashes when looking at sessions with 22 commands. Rather than seeing tens or hundreds of thousands of similar hashes, there were only 4. Looking more closely at the data demonstrated what w
The Handala hackers associated with Iran have breached the personal email account of FBI Director Kash Patel and published photos and documents. [...]
A vulnerability in the Smart Slider 3 WordPress plugin, active on more than 800,000 websites, can be exploited to allow subscriber-level users access to arbitrary files on the server. [...]
ShinyHunters claims it breached European Commission systems, leaking 350GB of data. Officials are investigating, with no independent verification yet.
Threat actors with ties to Iran successfully broke into the personal email account of Kash Patel, the director of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and leaked a cache of photos and other documents to the internet. Handala Hack Team, which carried out the breach, said on its website that Patel "will now find his name among the list of successfully hacked victims." In a statement
This is the third update to the TeamPCP supply chain campaign threat intelligence report, When the Security Scanner Became the Weapon (v3.0, March 25, 2026). Update 002 covered developments through March 27, including the Telnyx PyPI compromise and Vect ransomware partnership. This update covers developments from March 27-28, 2026. HIGH: First 48-Hour Window Without a New Supply Chain Compromise The most operationally significant development in the last 24 hours is what did not happen: no new package compromises have been confirmed since the Telnyx disclosure on March 27. This is the first 48-hour window without a new ecosystem compromise since TeamPCP began active operations on March 19. The prior operational cadence was aggressive -- a new target every 1-3 days (Trivy March 19, CanisterWorm March 20-22, Checkmarx March 23, LiteLLM March 24, Telnyx March 27). The current pause, combined with the Vect ransomware affiliate announcement, suggests TeamPCP has shifted primary operational focus from supply chain expansion to monetization of existing credential harvests. Analysts assess this pause should not be interpreted as the end of supply chain operations. TeamPCP explicitly stated they intend to be around for a long time, and stolen credentials from the estimated 300 GB trove could enable future package compromises at any time. The absence of new compromises may also reflect improved vigilance by package registries -- PyPI has quarantined two TeamPCP campaigns in rapid succession, which may be raising the attacker's cost of operations on that platform. Recommended action: Maintain heightened monitoring posture. Use this operational window to complete credential rotations and IOC sweeps if not already done. The CISA KEV remediation deadline for CVE-2026-33634 is now 11 days away (April 8, 2026). HIGH: Palo Alto Networks Publishes Behavioral Detection Rules for CI/CD Pipeline Attacks Palo Alto Networks has published detection rules specifically designed to identify TeamPCP-style CI/CD pipeline attacks at the behavioral level rather than relying solely on IOC matching. This is significant because TeamPCP has demonstrated the ability to rotate infrastructure across each new compromise wave -- each phase used different C2 domains, different exfiltration endpoints, and different packaging techniques (raw scripts, npm worm, .pth exploitation, WAV steganography). Behavioral detection approaches focus on anomalous CI/CD runner behavior: unexpected credential directory enumeration, bulk secret reads from /proc/ pid /mem , large encrypted archive creation, and outbound data transfers to newly registered domains during workflow execution. These patterns have been consistent across all five TeamPCP compromise phases even as specific IOCs changed. Recommended action: Organizations with Palo Alto Networks security products should review and deploy the published detection rules. All organizations should evaluate whether their CI/CD monitoring can detect the